Who thinks about this?
Soglasen.Edinstvennoe embarrassed that the cost of items often
prompted already very subjective and lack of coordination, especially
For works of artists unknown and poorly studied.
If you argue correctly and fairly is the subject of Fine Arts must
evaluated in terms of professional art history,
its freshness and originality, emotional impact, svoebraznosti
technique and t.d.Kak said well-known N. Nesterov:
"I do not care what is shown on the picture to me is important as it is done." Rate professionally, here on the forum, looking at
reproduction is very difficult or impossible, except perhaps
only thing is scheduled (pencil, pen). And yet there is often
estimated with the raid or on grounds of provenance, sonority
name or identity, regalia and party affiliation.
I fully agree with our authoritative forumistkoy Liana
(where she, incidentally zapropostilas?), for Gerasimov.
There is nothing to the outstanding work snapping up like hot cakes
at unbelievable tsenam.Sprashivaetsya, and who the buyer, whether
his own face? No! A person subjected to the herd instinct, without
spiritual "folds" in the mortal body, managed dubious and false authorities easily lie and barbarism.
And some "limited contingent" these bad feeding, using
delitanstvom and ignorance of our "individual" citizens.
reproduction
|