When once looked Primachenko work, I thought, she said. But since given to the installation of a doubt, has decided to further examine all. That's what happened with the position "and if she does not":
Flowers: drawn "better" than she drew in the 60's and more detailed;
birds: a feeling that after the middle of painting flowers, although in other studies, the main characters, animals, and everything else is "fastened" For beauty, so the legs of birds, in theory, should not climb on the flowers. Moreover, it was my legs and embarrassed, I did not see her such abstract approaches - such as the legs are somewhere in the area of the flower. She concrete legs should stand somewhere, and they stand on the plant and not in the area.
And the main thing - again, my feet she drew them from the edge of the body (naive) or as pellets in chickens (from the rural experience), but not with chopsticks from the middle of the body. Specifically reviewed the gallery of her works - only one, where many birds find a bird whose leg is a little climb on the trunk.
Signed here more "rounded" and did exactly as though a ruler. But in a 2-m-high letters say?
But if it does its job, it is one of the most artistic of her works.
|