fross, you know, there is a breed of people who love to criticize everything, good or bad! And they do not understand that the abuse - just to sprinkle a little saliva in different directions and in this particular case slyapat parshivenkuyu articles. I do not deny that there have been mastered a lot of money (7.7 billion rubles), not only for the reconstruction of Tsaritsyno that contemporary art at the exhibition was small (although in my opinion it is there for anything, and even that is only spoils the impression). BUT!! Personally, I really like the Caricyno now, culturally, cozy, well maintained, some I vozvrazyat - say, no spirit of the ruins, ghosts, etc. But, sorry, this loose in the Moscow area, but not so far from the center appeared a beautiful manicured park with facilities for presentation as it looked earlier, and admire the majesty of the time and its architects. I assure you, on Zavalin do not see. The fact that the author generally poorly versed in the art can be seen only in this phrase:
Цитата:
|
«severe style, seventies, eighties - and so on. Smoothly and cleanly, but sadly till you drop. Also a historical fact: it is "soft" Brezhnev socialist realists now in honor.
|
I have twice been on these shows, and can say with confidence that they are more than worthy. Assembly of the Russian Museum just шедеврально, most of the submitted works can be seen for hours. "Time to collect" weaker compared with the first exhibition, but believe me such a good little Yakovlev where you will see. A bad thing provided it works Grigorieva can only ignorant, but that "rags Novikova, and portraits of Stalin no longer enjoys. Actually, I to, Grigoriev there certainly true, not all that is written to be believed. Puni raises some questions, but to call it Owned by
"extremely rude slyapannym falshakom" is impossible.