Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 17.05.2011, 09:24 Язык оригинала: Русский       #9
Гуру
 
Аватар для redbor
 
Регистрация: 26.01.2009
Сообщений: 4,911
Спасибо: 799
Поблагодарили 1,712 раз(а) в 1,079 сообщениях
Репутация: 3349
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Santa Claus Посмотреть сообщение
Spelling in more than 100 years, much has changed ...
In what kind of academy graduates during
missed letters in words, writing ChenstYhovskaya? belongs?
 I have no doubt the icon and the inscription.
Icon of good-almost an exact copy of the list of Czestochowa icon,
 which was donated by M. Kutuzov in the Kazan Cathedral.
The question is not about that, and the blame. I wanted to clarify -
which, in addition to this inscription, there is evidence supporting the brush M. Bryansk?
From etgo depends, and evaluation. Repeatedly.
Just in case, let me remind - M. Bryansk author of the only lifetime portrait of St. John of Kronstadt.
 
Цитата:
Сообщение от Kid Loco Посмотреть сообщение
And I also stand by the opinion of Father - the signature is beyond doubt
That is, you do not doubt that this signature did the artist M. Bryansk?
Цитата:
Сообщение от Kid Loco Посмотреть сообщение
You know I was thinking - but not too late if this artist to baptize children?
And what have the "baptism"? Written for the blessing. "

/It is logical to assume that the very icon and an inscription written capable, but not very literacy, painters,
 and everything is in place: the icon-painter did not write it belonged to him and he blessed her his daughter .. /




Последний раз редактировалось redbor; 17.05.2011 в 09:48.
redbor вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо redbor за это полезное сообщение: