Цитата:
|
Сообщение от uriart; 1616763"
Then what argument?
|
No doubt. Like everything put in order, because it was easy to get lost in the above. Said about one painting, a photograph of the other.
Цитата:
|
Сообщение от uriart; 1616763"
OlegTsi and the first four photos, is not with the same job?
The difference can only see the last photo.
|
I showed four pictures of the same work from different sources, and wrote about it.
Цитата:
Сообщение от OlegTsi
Photo 1 - discussed the picture in Germany
Photo 2 - sold at Christie's
Photo 3 - painting sold at Matsarte.
Photo 4 - painting with Galerie Variations, Brussels, Belgium.
As can be seen, this one and the same work.
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от uriart
It is a pity that I have no photos of the work that was in Kiev.
|
Yes, sorry,
Uriart, you do not have photos of paintings, of which you mention.
Obtained such a situation:
Fake work under Levitan 15 years ago was in Ukraine. (2011-15=1996)
Then has long been one of the galleries and is offered as a fake.
Then he went abroad (apparently she was taken by kotrabandnym).
In December 1999 she was sold at Christie's in London for 52,000 dollars.
Provenance while there was no.
In November 2007 it was sold at auction Matsart Israel and was sold for 190,000 dollars. Provenance - Christie, 1999, London.
Apparently it was bought by Jacob Pereman from Israel, a collector of art Levitan, since a subsequent owner of Gallerie Variations in Brussels described in provenance and Christies and Peremana.
At this time, gallery Variations sold to someone the job (at ARTNeT was listed Sold), and that someone put it in Germany at auction Karl und Faber.
If you originally Christie made a mistake, calling a fake second etude, then, of course, is a fatal mistake. The picture has been its history and provenance, and those who do not read our forum, will continue to move it to artrynku.
Painting the picture 5 with my post number 6 is placed for general information and comparison.
That's right, think of all the simpler and on the shelves.