Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 08.07.2008, 10:27 Язык оригинала: Русский       #48
Гуру
 
Аватар для Allena
 
Регистрация: 03.06.2008
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 5,173
Спасибо: 14,185
Поблагодарили 6,385 раз(а) в 1,659 сообщениях
Репутация: 13112
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от qwerty Посмотреть сообщение
Another thing is when they begin to interfere with the officials, hanging labels - this is a normal person is nothing but a protest can not call
qwerty, definitely agree about the labels. What did the administration of the Tretyakov Gallery, dismissing Erofeev, unworthy. They were able to openly declare its position in relation to the said show, it would be more honest. Could, eventually, offer the person to leave himself - well, it did not work, well, do not they take his work, well, foreign to it (in the opinion of the administration) of the State Tretyakov Gallery. As a human being can understand it all. Of course, the media in this case would have written a lot, but it is as they say, is another story. This is the same case when an honest way the administration has been - and not one. You are right about the officials, oh how wrong. And now, about art outrageous I can not agree with you. Epatage - no doubt, and art, I think, is not here. Select a theme, which will cause the greatest impact, and - in advance. And there is no dispute about the religion can not be, then I also agree with you. If, for example, when someone from your family some bully will enable a brazen ugly trick, as you respond? Correct: naturally, quickly and adequately, because for any normal person there are moral values (even in the era of post-modernism), which normally protects it from any evil spirits. The fact that knowingly and intentionally hurt the feelings of people (do not say: Orthodox Christians, - any, not necessarily religious sentiments) - is art? Why deliberate offensive hooligan antics in the doorway - it is a criminal offense for which the deadline falls due, and the same thing, but in the exhibition hall - is art? The easiest way to inflate his cheeks and with a clever kind consider "creation" in the search for deeper meaning ... Should society protect itself? And can any "creation" to call art, and on this basis - hands off! Yes, of course, to the exhibition, as a rule, they go voluntarily. Nobody do not have to. But there must be at the curators something inside ... Earlier it was called the conscience. Sorry for the naivete.



Allena вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 5 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Allena за это полезное сообщение:
emir (04.08.2008), Glasha (08.07.2008), K-Maler (10.04.2009), Nik (08.07.2008), Евгений (30.07.2008)