31.03.2011, 12:01
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#5
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 26.07.2008
Адрес: РФ, Самара
Сообщений: 75,405
Спасибо: 27,869
Поблагодарили 55,331 раз(а) в 24,284 сообщениях
Репутация: 102391
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Seriy; 1580743"
What a contrast with an interview with a Russian gallery owner, who proudly declares that sends in the trash a portfolio of new artists who are not looking.
|
This interview with Sergei Popov of pop /off /art:
C. P.: Portfolio us every day they send over the Internet in large numbers. We almost did not otsmatrivaem them. 99 percent bullshit. Decent portfolio yield only for some contacts, or when the curators of the people to see me lead. Gelman in this respect is much more dynamic figure than I do, it has more areas and takes a lot of dynamics. It does not work with an artist like me, does not work with legacy, does not work with backgrounds artist for 20-30 years. He works with today, and he needs more young blood. I am also very conservative in this respect, man. I need to immediately see the artist in embryo, that with this guy I'll be able to work about 30 years. And there are very few. And young, I have very little. My conservatism is dictated by the fact that there are no such figures, in which I could be sure in advance. A momentary, selling, selling, I was never attracted.
Added after 8 minutes
Seriy, and that it hurt you so "portfolio in the trash?
You are not the first time this portfolio mentions on the forum.
A vivid image?
He scares you?
Последний раз редактировалось Кирилл Сызранский; 31.03.2011 в 12:10.
Причина: Добавлено сообщение
|
|
|