I am not a liar and for everything I have written, ready to respond, but if something is messed up - sincerely apologize.
How much time to see on this forum made to cut the truth-the uterus, not zamorachivayas a so-called "corporate ethics". Nevertheless, the sum of people are not very much and if my text is in some way this helps, I'm totally for it do not hold on.
Although re-read it carefully, nothing criminal is not found. The fact that the experts (like all real people) can make mistakes, it's without me, we all know. What information afforded Gallery Shishkina, I do not know, I saw only the "floating image" with the text on the front page of this site. Maybe you say something was misunderstood, and maybe this information provided a gallery of the last owner of the painting. So, no shadows on the auction is not cast in general, I see no fundamental difference in the left picture is the first home owners recently, or 15-20 years ago. The important thing is that it is absolutely true.
Your keen interest to me would have been understandable, if you - the new owner of the work. In this case, ready to walk with you (and Benoit in his hands) on a visit to the former owners. I am confident that it will make an impression on them and we can there anything else (I even know that!) - To buy.
If you are not a new owner, the ... Well I do not know, justify their interest somehow, and I promise, I will do everything possible to in personal correspondence or telephone conversation, all questions for you prooyasnit. A deal in an open topic, someone whose relative, probably does not make sense.
P.S. Of course, nobody I'm not a relative ...
|