Тема: Maastricht 2011
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 21.03.2011, 20:56 Язык оригинала: Русский       #9
Гуру
 
Аватар для LCR
 
Регистрация: 29.04.2008
Адрес: Париж
Сообщений: 6,211
Спасибо: 18,677
Поблагодарили 38,263 раз(а) в 5,446 сообщениях
Репутация: 29883
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Konstantin Посмотреть сообщение
1. Antiquarian smaller, more modern, and contemporary become involved in the same gallery. The reason - difitsit antiques.
I think that there is no shortage of antiques there, but first-class works by the market becomes smaller.

Цитата:
Сообщение от Vladimir Посмотреть сообщение
Actually erstwhile arrogance in relation to contemporary art recalls the pride of the captains of the real economy in relation to the Internet in early 1990. Now in force include generation of brokers, under the new flavors will have to adjust the sentence.
I do not share your analysis: first, if the arrogance and was then most of the world so sovriska, staring with disdain at everything that was not included in this category. This situation is well reflected price: Hals and Cranach - cheaper than some herstovni. Can not say that the situation is completely inverted. But now, in my view, contemporary art, at least for some time has passed the position in favor of the old masters and modernism.
Do not forget that people who bought the actual artists promoted shortly before the crisis, will have to wait and wait for their work reached the price they paid the price - if it ever happens.
Investors clearly prefer to invest in the less speculative and the proven part of the art market.



LCR вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 6 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо LCR за это полезное сообщение:
fross (21.03.2011), Glasha (22.03.2011), kozhinart (22.03.2011), uriart (22.03.2011), U_Z (22.03.2011), Сима (21.03.2011)