Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 24.02.2011, 17:50 Язык оригинала: Русский       #2
Гуру
 
Аватар для Vladimir
 
Регистрация: 20.03.2008
Сообщений: 8,085
Спасибо: 3,353
Поблагодарили 25,444 раз(а) в 5,540 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 250
Репутация: 23525
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Jukov Посмотреть сообщение
You know, the concept of actual need, as it is fashionable now to say," deconstruct. " Nothing like that "actual" in the modern world is no more, because there is clearly the notion of historical progress. Currently co-exist practices that vary in time and place of origin: Kabakov, romanticism, baroque, Aboriginal art in Australia. Now we not only an era of globalization, but also the era of transtemporal. This is a typical post-modern phenomenon - because postmodernism has not been canceled, even though about it and do not like to say now. So that by itself the criterion of relevance does not seem to me a valid criterion. Applicable criterion for me is the criterion of relevance. That is, I want to show in Venice that, in a sense, is relevant
Very good interview. This way, the answer to the question, why now can not single out any one backbone ideas why the exhibitions are not coming enlightenment. Because a lot of ideas.



Vladimir вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Vladimir за это полезное сообщение:
K-Maler (26.02.2011), Люси (25.02.2011)