Цитата:
Сообщение от iside
I have quoted Peter a, but the issue would like to ask all participants.
Ie if indeed there are criteria for evaluation of abstract painting, then everything becomes very simple.
|
All will be very simple, if you do the very difficult conditions - to teach these criteria. And it's not simply because they do not always and not all are formalized, but also because learning it can serve as a foundation for learning, personal experience, without which formal methods are dead.
Цитата:
Сообщение от iside
For example, if I, as someone who has not mastered these criteria, which is attached here or a job or even a series of works by one artist, without specifying its name, then I can get a professional opinion, how much good work and whether they work of genius or a scribble, from someone who decided to become an artist?
Because I have a suspicion that the opinions will differ, and even very likely that will not coincide with the opinions of eminent critics.  |
Even if you collect a sufficient number of "eminent critics," and then vypoluchite discordance, but still, I think a trend is noticeable. And at the forum, you think all ravnoimenity and all are equally owned by the criteria? Forums - it's quite a motley community, although, of course, higher level than simple random sampling.
Цитата:
Сообщение от iside
Why am I all that? I really like to read theoretical arguments about abstraction, but I've said many times to persuade and not by the example of abstract paintings that every man has his opinion, especially when it comes to fresh pictures and new names, but not even very new.
|
That's exactly