Тема: Abstract forever
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 16.02.2011, 21:25 Язык оригинала: Русский       #54
Гуру
 
Аватар для iside
 
Регистрация: 06.07.2009
Адрес: Другая Планета
Сообщений: 1,119
Спасибо: 3,965
Поблагодарили 3,149 раз(а) в 834 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 31
Репутация: 6318
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Peter Посмотреть сообщение
Yes, there are criteria for evaluation of abstract painting and they are not many otltchayutsya on the criteria of realistic painting. If a child draws abracadabra, it is her, and will remain, and no one would never call it "creation" abstract art. A professional artist, even in the abstract will solve the problem really is quite realistic if we are talking about a picture. Firstly it will be the layout, that is the location on the sheet.
I have quoted Peter a, but the issue would like to ask all participants.
Ie if indeed there are criteria for evaluation of abstract painting, then everything becomes very simple.
For example, if I, as a man who owns these criteria, which is attached here or a job or even a series of works by one artist, without specifying its name, then I can get a professional opinion, how much good work and whether they were work of genius or a scribble from someone who decided to become an artist?
Because I have a suspicion that the opinions will differ, and even very likely that will not coincide with the opinions of eminent critics.

Why am I all that? I really like to read theoretical arguments about abstraction, but I've said many times to persuade and not by the example of abstract paintings that every man has his opinion, especially when it comes to fresh pictures and new names, but not even very new.
__________________
Per aspera ad astra



iside вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 8 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо iside за это полезное сообщение:
Art-lover (17.02.2011), DSF (17.02.2011), fabosch (16.02.2011), GalARTA (16.02.2011), Peter (17.02.2011), Samvel (19.02.2011), Елизавета (01.04.2011), Станиславский (16.02.2011)