[Станиславский]

Indeed, very interesting and important topic. Thank you so much for its discovery.

I would here like to touch here is some perspective. Professed Roman Ingardenom phenomenological method in the approach to the perception of abstract art is certainly very important and productive. However, let's look at this issue from the other side - from the "metaphysics of abstraction. And here, of course, necessary to the discovery of psychoanalysis. Freud postulated the existence of a great man trudnopostizhimoy for the study areas - the unconscious. It is to her, in my opinion, in the first place and appeals abstract (or non-figurative) art. In contrast to figurative art, which is primarily addressed to our conscious field with preconceived notions out there about the form, composition, structure, space, etc. Our conscious installation in a sense, prevented deeper penetration into the unconscious message of the artist. Abstract art as remove all barriers to such penetration, and directly appeal to our psychological depth. Also remind of the widest distribution of the so-called projective psychology, where the use of abstraction is the key to the deep layers of the human psyche and helps people better understand the source of some of his views on the world, actions and deeds. The simplest example - spot Rorschach (appendix).

And here the question arises: whether to apply to the assessment of abstract (non-figurative) art of the same criteria as for figurative art, given the fact that they are addressed to different spheres of human consciousness?