Цитата:
Сообщение от Tana
lazycat In this instance you are disgrace their illiteracy and ignorance of the law, if the "owner in America, there is always the trustee or the acting (especially if the room such values).
|
Well if you're not a lawyer and do not understand the difference between a search warrant in the home and search the premises jur. persons who do not know against whom a criminal case in which a search is conducted, what you are trying to prove? That employees of SC RF, Moscow Region, broke all imaginable norms themselves have signed a verdict? This is ridiculous.
Have you ever personally witnessed the testing room jur. faces at least DAEC? Just checking, according to some nasty customer? When the staff is forbidden to use mobile phones is prohibited to remove his hands from the table, it is forbidden to move around the room. And it does not matter - is present at the same time head of the organization or not. And this note on legal grounds. If only a little, a very little understood in legal matters, and stupidly did not read the article of the CPC, the stupid would not talk.
Posted 6 minutes
Valerit
In Russia all the same. The room faces, a leading financial and economic activities, can not stay Unaccounted cash. Responsibility - as far as criminal, for the illegal business.