Why a portrait of Pushkin's office was decorated with the censor?
Because the poet called: "Soul excellent gusts!"
But Pushkin about Viagra:
"What low cunning half dead amusing."
That's me to the fact that any text can be zatsitirovat to death (before the loss of meaning) if it is wrested from their native context and placed in another.
And now some forumlyane unwittingly trapped in traumatic citation - deciding that they are dealing with some vocabulary designed to clarify the concepts of modern art.
(If the topic was specifically relied on such comic effect, then apologize for his inappropriate comment.)
To avoid misunderstandings, the topic should be called the "Glossary of terms of the Moscow conceptual Schools
- Under the name of the book, from where entries
(compiled by Andrew Monastery, Publishing «Ad Marginem», M. 1999.).
Or give
link text, so people are not afraid of that naglyukannye art figures they want to hang noodles on the ears, but could be deduced from the preface:
Цитата:
|
... and on the strangeness of naming, and definitions immediately obvious that this is - ironic fantasy. However, imagination is quite natural for conceptualism as a direction in art (as opposed to philosophy). Here, in contrast to the philosophy, we are dealing with poezisom concepts. If there is such a thing as a "philosophical poetics", it is conceptualism (at least in its "theoretical" part, presented a dictionary) accentuates this poetic phrase, stressed "unreal" - that first requires unwarranted credibility and only then understood. So, Conceptualism as poetry philosophy. It is with this, in my opinion, this is the case the reader. It is in this perspective is represented Moscow Conceptualism.
|
In general, these words (originally intended not for the general public, but for philosophical game of the narrow range of poets and intellectuals) - no longer "contemporary art", but its rather distant history.