[Ylot]

Сообщение от Fed

Not interested. Moreover, that "literacy classes number 1" Nate Nove in his book you bring long quotations Malevich, who do not prove anything, but simply serve as a reflection of his views.
    He has a picture of pozanyatnee before and after. And he himself, after a 50-podzabrosil Suprematism, tired of shows.

Amazing! As people, having enough decent education, knowledge and artistic heritage, at the end of the twentieth century could just talk about the phenomenon of primitive art in the face of Malevich and his work, at a time when the world community of artists recognized his services for a long time. Most of them enjoy his achievements in his work. Those who disregard knowledge of his theories never become artists, and the "geeks" - native artistic knowledge (art)!
You can make trouble. Why, because we loan "Ivanov, Petrov, Sidorov, (Altamira cave paintings), they are good artists. Persons in their portraits as vivid as in the photo. This view reminds me of images from the "madhouse" - Napoleon, Pushkin and Stalin. " Anyone can call himself anything but lacking match. Portraits write and write many, but few have written something like "Gioconda" by Leonardo da Vinci. Why? Because they do not possess those skills, which he owned. Because they do not possess the knowledge, which was filled with the consciousness of Leonardo. Because poorly studied, and the knowledge acquired can not be used. Because the "geeks" zabaltyvayut their minds. Moreover, if it is born an artist who owns all of the above, not many people will pay attention to it. Retro - it's cute, it's good, but it does not move the art forward. It improves (polishes, polish or scratch) already achieved. Does not invent anything new, does not develop a creative idea.
Desire to escape from the framework of foreign ideas, should be welcomed. Among the inhabitants, which include everyone who does not understand "the KGB", more often those who are swans on the bed with canopy, gives a real emotional and aesthetic pleasure. They believe that the aesthetics of this growing their spiritual significance.
Are encouraged to put the task of the artist. I am confident that you will be able to pose the problem that has long someone has decided, and so do "Losers" are written off homework for more than a clever fellow.
After this discussion, for me personally, it becomes clear that my opponents too deep "digging." And this is his hobby got through (ignore) the "noble layer. I want to return your consciousness to the passage of his own quotes:
"... All this has become absolute, the axiom that does not require any proof, knowing with whom it is impossible not to agree, in which shame and doubt is simply indecent to discuss."
Dear theorists! Malevich in his life made one single picture. All the rest of his work, creative pursuits, the processes of knowledge (education), imitation, copying, teaching activities, literary hobbies, socializing - all this is readily available materials, laboratory material for the realization of their creative thoughts. Arbitrarily, you can build your verbiage about "KGB" to try to make their work significantly, but your findings do not show the merits of Malevich. Each of the reasons you mentioned solves one of the tasks that ultimately an artist, a consciousness, realized in the "black box».