Тема: David Tiholuz
Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 17.12.2008, 11:53 Язык оригинала: Русский       #70
Гуру
 
Аватар для artcol
 
Регистрация: 13.09.2008
Сообщений: 12,117
Спасибо: 6,219
Поблагодарили 6,562 раз(а) в 3,052 сообщениях
Репутация: 12914
Отправить сообщение для artcol с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от artcol Посмотреть сообщение
no way towards showing no effect on the ESSENCE
Somehow you got me right in the opponents enrolled.
You know, in modern philosophy is a direction - poststructuralism. One of his key thesis is the thesis of panyazykovoy nature (nature) of thinking. Ie speech - the language of rights - directly correlates with his consciousness. Clear and precise speech=clear, clear consciousness. From the man in such a clear and concise speech = clear and sharp mind to communicate not only pleasant but also useful. There is another way of voice communication - suggestive: through images, emotions, etc. Many people and ideas - images and pictures.
But you, excuse me, neither one nor the other. Plus all that I wrote before.

I know all this not to reproach you say, but only with regards to:
Implicitly have a feeling that this particular style of presentation of thought as you, does not suggest the seriousness of the writer or on the discussion, nor to the audience ...



artcol вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо artcol за это полезное сообщение: