Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 28.12.2010, 13:36 Язык оригинала: Русский       #420
Banned
 
Регистрация: 11.07.2009
Сообщений: 1,789
Спасибо: 852
Поблагодарили 1,805 раз(а) в 972 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 23
Репутация: 3342
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA Посмотреть сообщение
L-ana64110, this is a deep philosophical question.
For (proper) art queues will never be ..
art-always was, is and will be elitist (and kogogo kind! elite "is another matter ...)
Цитата:
Сообщение от NATA NOVA Посмотреть сообщение
Fed, when I mention the "art" I do not mean any "cult objects", or "investment" (ie something, and another act In your example as a commodity rather than "art") - catch the difference?)

The art of doing (and valued) identity ("who knew") .. But everything else-could be considered a model.

Posted 7 minutes

And how to sell in the early 90's!
gallery gelereyki, dealers and dilerki, street trading images and magazintsy suvenirtsev rastsveteli pyshnyi color ...
The Soviet people were educated so that to have a picture to give a picture it was a certain level of prestige and culture. Now when the man appeared to-consumer, he nafikk art is not necessary. Give him a Chinese shirpoteb, but not now.
Of course, what are consumers of art is a 2%jaded bourgeois is the place to be, but there is a Parallel non-commercial culture. Sometimes they even overlap - eg, Banksy. Your choice, gentlemen of the artists with whom to be.



Posav вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Posav за это полезное сообщение:
Pavel (28.12.2010)