Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 20.12.2010, 12:41 Язык оригинала: Русский       #51
Гуру
 
Аватар для Eriksson
 
Регистрация: 13.11.2008
Адрес: Стокгольм
Сообщений: 2,829
Спасибо: 2,474
Поблагодарили 2,597 раз(а) в 943 сообщениях
Репутация: 4971
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от khmelev Посмотреть сообщение
In Belgium, he designed all of the documents so as to get back the taxes, ie, that the subject was tax-free. At the current means of communication, obviously, with the export operation by Belgian customs became known in Russia, to whom it is necessary.
Thus arose the legal conflict.

Taksfri can be issued only one company /store that participates in the international system. Certainly not in the church community. This is the first.

Tax on the transaction will pay the ecclesial community, ie seller, and not the buyer. This is the second.

Tax on sold to Russia (or all early to) painting will pay Pevsner, in any case. Tax will be charged on the amount of profit. For art objects - a special tax scheme.

The only way to evade tax - to issue a transaction at an undervalue and indicate a loss. I do not think that the Russian Museum has gone to such a scam.
This is the third.

And finally - the main thing. No need to build a conspiracy theory in the region, which is not too great competence.




Последний раз редактировалось Eriksson; 20.12.2010 в 12:58.
Eriksson вне форума   Ответить с цитированием