Most of his life Yakovlev was almost blind. Hence, such a rabid (in a good way) in the expressiveness of his paintings. He painted not what he saw as a certain image, which is formed before his mind's eye. Therefore, the easiest way to evaluate his paintings from a position: how could they draw a blind man?
For example, there is a whole constellation of fake Yakovlev, a very even such a typical and beautiful, but with almost the same signatures (which is at once disturbing). Well, secondly, all these studies are very difficult to Yakovlev's background. He could not so apply the paint - just do not see this. By the way, part of the work of this poddelschika flashed on this forum.
With regard to these paintings. Look at the left. Could a blind man to cut around all these flowers? Really not sure. The same argument can be applied to the second picture. Yakovlev generally avoided trace the flowers, especially in the 70th (although it did in the early nineties, when he underwent surgery on his eyes and he began to see). He tried to build a drawing brush strokes, rather than contours. Besides, I do not like serdtsevinki colors. According to my observations, Yakovlev often painted them with dots or strokes of rough, but here they seem emerges. He worked as a simpler, more ...
In general, the works look very unreliable. Although, of course, Silaev say precisely. Send him a picture, perhaps pictures will be enough.
|