Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 13.12.2010, 16:32 Язык оригинала: Русский       #64
Гуру
 
Аватар для Allena
 
Регистрация: 03.06.2008
Адрес: Москва
Сообщений: 5,173
Спасибо: 14,185
Поблагодарили 6,385 раз(а) в 1,659 сообщениях
Репутация: 13112
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky Посмотреть сообщение
How is it" do "? They call this customer service, pays for the work of money, wants to know the time of creation. This is not art criticism expertise and technology. The expert can not even hear the name of the supposed author, know this does not know.
And here, incidentally, an interesting problem
Let us bring the technological expertise that's a byaku. Expert looks at her and realizes that the product in front of him, "Chernigov blood."
What should he do: warn the customer that it byaka? And if the customer himself byaka and wants to sell the fake, pre-equipping its original estimate?
If the examiner will give the conclusion that the work done then that (which would fit well in the legend byaki), then by doing so he consciously will promote the market penetration of another deliberate forgeries.
Perhaps there are some rules, codes of conduct on such conflicts? Or both? Who in the course - Tell, please.



Allena вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Allena за это полезное сообщение:
Евгений (13.12.2010)