Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 08.12.2010, 17:45 Язык оригинала: Русский       #6
Пользователь
 
Регистрация: 01.09.2010
Сообщений: 36
Спасибо: 15
Поблагодарили 40 раз(а) в 13 сообщениях
Репутация: 80
По умолчанию

Seriy, as well as all the other artists!
Either you come to the conclusion that the rescue of drowning - is the handiwork of drowning. And then you have to own (with wives /husbands, siblings, other relatives or hired lawyers) to delve into all the details of contracts with galleries (as in their own country and abroad).
Or you conclude a contract with an agent (or contracts with agents). Then the agent (s) undertake all negotiations with buyers, galleries, etc., but in this case you would still need to own (or with relatives - see above) get into all details of the contract with the agent.
And if you transfer pictures to the agent, do not forget a very convenient legal 'stuff' - del credere (paragraph 1 of Article 993 of the Civil Code). Proper use of this provision encourages the agent to ensure that the exercise increased caution, making deals for his client because otherwise the agent would have to pay for most choices
unscrupulous.
Just be aware that someone good at writing patterns, someone - well they sell, and someone - give good legal advice. "A mix these three craft is darkness hunters, so now it's just usually ends badly.
With regard to galeristka, which received 47 paintings and "forgot" about the artist, doing so under certain conditions could be described as a fraud ....



Ninon вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 5 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Ninon за это полезное сообщение:
mitriy_s (13.08.2011), NATA NOVA (08.12.2010), Seriy (08.12.2010), Валерий Рыбаков (09.12.2010), Евгений (08.12.2010)