Цитата:
|
Сообщение от critic; 1402401"
is not misleading.
|
Simply discussing the picture, no one disputes, try to reason with a cold look at it.
Firstly it is clear that a purely subjective opinion, since Above all, remember that there is no single analytical method that would provide comprehensive information both about the nature, composition, structure, origin, material, technique and authenticity of the artwork. Answers to these questions can only be obtained by comparing and analyzing data from different methods. Therefore, the scientific study of art should be complex, and its members should be experts of various laboratories, restoration workshops, and art historians.
But for something common efforts can and come. For me, the question arises.
Bronnikov Wanderers was fascinated and wanted to join their members. He is preparing a series of paintings for the third mobile exhibition. One of the paintings presented here. Pictures of all the complex and not small in size. For Bronnikov is not just an exhibition but a kind of test, because it is the concept of the Wanderers with his sweet Italian themes.
And he has not become members of the PVC. Upset in the 4-th exhibition is not involved.
Why, and when he managed to do two similar pictures??
And anyway, the picture shown Cyril Syzransky want to buy, just going out in it, and now under discussion do not want to buy. You see the difference when they are next.