Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 11.12.2008, 12:53 Язык оригинала: Русский       #19
Гуру
 
Аватар для artcol
 
Регистрация: 13.09.2008
Сообщений: 12,120
Спасибо: 6,224
Поблагодарили 6,565 раз(а) в 3,055 сообщениях
Репутация: 12917
Отправить сообщение для artcol с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Meister Посмотреть сообщение
and I think he was the art curator, who would very much like to cut the money, but does not know his laurels as a business artist Hirst rest ... do not give and not receive him, because shock in an attempt to cut the attendants too far ...
Course Gelman wanted to cut money, and he cuts off them. And you think not? All, of course, is relative, but nonetheless. Sucking two queens.
Strong events and figures in the arts - usually ripen long. Gelman sort of went into a phase of maturity. Previously - I do not like. After the Russian poor - the ratio changed.
And. Gelman - not only the curator, he is also a dealer. The curator is not financially solvent. It depends on the policies of those who give him money. His henchman is limited. Gelman also handles your money. As the same Saatchi.



artcol вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо artcol за это полезное сообщение:
LCR (11.12.2008)