My dear Master,
If we do not take into account the possibility of resorting to a major auction house (but until recent years random owners of works of art are rarely solved in a variety of reasons - lack of knowledge of the environment, the costs will not return if neprodazhi, etc.), I think Nicola rights.
Depending on the social position of different people have different opportunities to sell the good work of art. As for the galleries and antique dealers, it is precisely on this, and they earn their living: more recently (the last time the situation has changed), France 90%of the buyers and the provincial antique shops, and at provincial auctions were Parisian antique dealers, who then resold the purchased objects in their own shops. And not that provincial professionals do not know the value of their things, everyone just got their margins, and each had its own clientele, therefore, everyone was happy with his deal.
However, the example of Gauguin think insolvent: Provided that hozyani paintings knows that his painting - Gauguin (and who is Gauguin), no difficulties with the sale can not see. Recently the precedents: the taxi driver, with whom Rauschenberg once paid their jobs recently, any type, to obtain a picture of Bacon, do not remember for what, and on the Russian market of vendors abound. Everything is now just that - run take their pictures at auction)
|