Цитата:
Сообщение от iside
Castellana I like, incidentally. Delighted I bet not, but like it.
artcol, I do not know about you, but I have to somehow classify the actual art, so to speak, to hold a primary coarse filter - start sharing all of that what emotions I have is the product. Nausea, dizziness, feeling of filth, headache, fear 
So Castellana me nothing of the sort is even interesting to watch at times, what he has invented a <!--~ ~ -> |
And I did - to delight. Still, American Contemporary - it is another, and Castellana - a Christian Europe, it is closer in spirit. But other than that the Pope is nothing more I've seen (and some dinazavrikov), I'm afraid to spoil the impression
Thing is very strong. Frankly, analogs do not know.
By the way, as the Castellana and Hirst himself is not doing anything, just the concept.
Posted 3 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Posav
It's not about price and content.
|
In Pelevin, in my opinion, in Chapayev and emptiness is a monologue of one of the heroes (banditstvuyuschego intellectual or vice versa) on the winds of change. Content in art - the prerogative of the artist, but perhaps it is the artist? Teach a man to do - he does. Robot. But still well done, I think he should now just be a masterpiece flowers.