Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 06.11.2010, 17:45 Язык оригинала: Русский       #28
Гуру
 
Аватар для fabosch
 
Регистрация: 06.04.2010
Адрес: Санкт-Петербург
Сообщений: 1,283
Спасибо: 3,923
Поблагодарили 4,953 раз(а) в 992 сообщениях
Репутация: 9945
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky Посмотреть сообщение
trouble with all these artists is that they are teamed in these invented Shinkareva Mitka.
You should have them all just be Vasiliev, Petrov, Sidorov ... Many have benefited from this, I think. And once the word "Mitka" is this Shagin, but it is not gud.
You know, Cyril, is debatable. Well, that is, by and large you are probably right. And even then, it is not clear. It would be easier to break one by one the Impressionists, do you think? And by the way, they, too, lacked a very ordinary. quite a mediocre artist. Just a story, as always, clever old lady, their not very maintained. But even some feeble works now will cost money, just because it's the Impressionists. And that, some of them have lost their individuality? No, you know, this kind of associations are very helpful at the initial stage of the creative ways. And then everything happens just as always happens - that's Mitka quarreled because large individual was closely within a group with all the ...




Последний раз редактировалось fabosch; 06.11.2010 в 18:44.
fabosch вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 9 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо fabosch за это полезное сообщение:
Allena (16.11.2010), bububush (10.11.2010), Glasha (18.11.2010), L-ana64110 (06.11.2010), LCR (07.11.2010), luka77 (06.11.2010), rnv (18.11.2010), Игорь Гурьев (06.11.2010), олег назаров (09.11.2010)