Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 02.07.2008, 09:36 Язык оригинала: Русский       #25
Бывалый
 
Регистрация: 25.04.2008
Сообщений: 267
Спасибо: 200
Поблагодарили 196 раз(а) в 76 сообщениях
Репутация: 158
По умолчанию

Okay, I'll write 'em again, not as an argument to dispute, but simply for information.

Цитата:
Сообщение от fross Посмотреть сообщение
replica hurts the eyes and non-specialist, especially now, many have seen look like the restored interiors of other museums in other countries.
Enumerate replica, which is on the run comes to mind:

1. Recovered after the destruction of the palaces of St. Petersburg and the surrounding area:
  • Peterhof (palaces and fountains)
  • Pavlovsk
  • Catherine Palace in Tsarskoe Selo
  • The Constantine Palace in Strelna
2. Amber Room in Catherine Palace in the same
3. Church of Christ the Savior in Moscow
4. Tsarina

And I called without hesitation. If poissledovat topic, the list can be increased tenfold.

What, did not have to do this rebuild? Tourists (and not just tourists) is not interesting?

And how many more damaged and dilapidated, and just come in a very deplorable state. Alexander Palace in Tsarskoe Selo (looks terrible), Menshikov Palace in Oranienbaum (almost destroyed), Pavlovsk Palace in Gatchina (condition unimportant), the Yusupov Palace House in St. Petersburg (also state very so-so) ... Well, etc. etc. In Moscow, too, just enough.

Enough?

By the way, every thing is restored - it is also essentially modern replica.



Nik вне форума   Ответить с цитированием