Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky
fabosch, with your eyes on Mitki as a subculture can not agree, although nothing is leskovskogo I have not seen it.
Aref'eva very much, Vasmi pleased to consider, but what they Mitka, huh?, But Shinkarevsky shaginsky-set I was not clear until now. Look at this painting and wonder: why do all this fuss?
"Dined" on these Mitka, as I understand, mostly writers, who wrote about them, some television journalists, cases of these films and programs. Sat on the topic, and so the torus on it sometimes go.
I have all the noise around Mitki perceive as imposed by the laughter of the hall in humorous programs on our TV: see laughing, very funny and does not need to choose two options - or people laughing at jokes there the count fool or a fool not to understand humor count.
Choose the second option. 
|
Well, well, Cyril, do not slander on myself. I think you do not like cats because they do not know how to cook them
You have everything in front. I will try to work on your aesthetic taste - and we will succeed!
Everything related to noise and journalists is hardly worth us with you to discuss. This is all a consequence of the very same subculture. Directly to the painting it is not relevant. And we all try to talk about it, that all turn right at humor?
A relative of painting can not agree with you. And Shinkarev and Yashka and Florensky quite a independent artists with their individual artistic world, that all fell in a heap. Junior Shagin leaves me calm. It's a splint that has a right to exist, has its fans, to which I belong.
But the painting, for example, A. Kuznetsov and I. Vasilyeva, certainly has its merits, although it may not please everyone. This is a matter of taste.
And talk about painting chohom Mitki that it no, it seems to me simply a consequence of insufficient knowledge of the subject
'll Post more pics soon