05.11.2010, 01:43
|
Язык оригинала: Русский
#5
|
|
Гуру
Регистрация: 06.04.2010
Адрес: Санкт-Петербург
Сообщений: 1,283
Спасибо: 3,923
Поблагодарили 4,953 раз(а) в 992 сообщениях
Репутация: 9945
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от Guriev, Igor
Oh, by the experience.
This is not a Holbein and contemporaries Holbein: too much psychology, and he appeared only during the Khalsa.
That is kind of like the style of the 16 th century, but actually gives the 19-m.
Or a copy of the 18 th century with some of the lost original?
In general, a mysterious image: it is not clear either that the school, nor that of the century.
|
Yes, by Holbein somehow does not fit anything. There is something on Lotto, but it's not Lotto
|
|
|