[korosteloff]

I-V,
IV, yes, but that, nevertheless, the concept. Working, trying, there are supporters, sympathizers. But the form is not created their own, what I mean? What attachments in this? Something pitiful. Only because of love to fly? Who invests the money for love? There must be a cold calculation and a clear mind. From Conceptual buy Brener. This is the only thing we had. Dollar signs with green paint. Of the formalists - fire (with a thin, long line) and Puzenkov (rubbing). From figurative painting - Ter Oganyan (picture in picture), the same Puzenkov (computer). This is something of a Russian on a global level. I and my offer: the binocular image and paint with color.

Added after 22 minutes
Cyril Syzransky, Yes, even that there will not persuade me nothing. I'm talking about the "eternal truths" of investment. And truth, these are: the form must be above the image, and it, in turn, higher than the content. Pimenov - the content, it is not written in a new cylinder. And just so you can determine the formula for the fine artist - imagine how he would have written a cylinder. For example, Picasso - associative, Malevich - with a black shadow, Matisse - flat and so on. Discoveries of a very few. Even less - in the form. They can be reduced to the spot and the line: Fontana (a hole and scrape), Agam (unchanged), and so on. Incidentally, the same can be bought in Agama Gallart about, very cheap. For his level. Circulation, of course. Not for a solid museum, but a private collection. And certainly not a fake. I would be deluged with all schools, throwing Shishkin and Vasnetsov. Nobody ever buys art because of her beauty. Beauty can be copied to any elementary street artists. Only the opening and only original. There is this question - no deals. Let the artist cares about that his paintings were small, public, cataloged and difficult poddelyvaemy. How to deal with Picasso and Dali, means that they - ignoramuses.