Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 08.12.2008, 14:50 Язык оригинала: Русский       #32
Местный
 
Аватар для sss
 
Регистрация: 03.10.2008
Адрес: россия
Сообщений: 155
Спасибо: 2
Поблагодарили 706 раз(а) в 81 сообщениях
Репутация: 854
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzransky Посмотреть сообщение
It is Russia's practice, you are about our museum and royalties to the heirs?
And about our, including. Anyway, with regards to Deineko, Nalbandian, Glazunov - exactly. But Malevich, seemingly not much to publish. Western holders tried to claim, but we forgave them these misunderstandings, referring to the difference in laws. True, not much abused. Note that in our publications published some Impressionist paintings (from our museums), and in the western - others.
In Soviet times for each song in the play performed by the provincial theaters, the authors of songs contributed. This was done by committee for the Protection of buses. rights. Despite the fact that our "copyright" are very different from the international, adhered strictly enough. Moreover, the statute of limitations was distributed, almost to infinity.
Members of the SC had fought to get the order for registration of children's books (circulation of 3 million pcs.) And gets pleasure (in rubles). No less than children, especially if the book reprinted a dozen times and translated into other languages.



sss вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 7 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо sss за это полезное сообщение:
artcol (08.12.2008), DSF (09.12.2008), Glasha (08.12.2008), iosif (08.12.2008), SAH (17.04.2009), Кирилл Сызранский (08.12.2008), Самвел (08.12.2008)