Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 17.10.2010, 10:57 Язык оригинала: Русский       #17
Banned
 
Регистрация: 11.07.2009
Сообщений: 1,789
Спасибо: 852
Поблагодарили 1,805 раз(а) в 972 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 23
Репутация: 3342
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от Konstantin Посмотреть сообщение
Here's a good question. It seems to me this way: If an artist plays around (space, objects, people) as accurately as possible (realism), then see what happens (and get there) is not difficult. Enough to compare. But if you create something new (in color, shape, etc.) here and the question arises as to whether the hand plays what in your mind? And if not exactly with the plan, the result is better or worse?
Even if an artist creates something new, then it is created on the basis of their knowledge of color theory, formal composition, his life experience into art. Let's just say, even if it is not painting, and dance, and a person wants to convey his mood through movement. He begins to move, twitch, but if this is not just movement and dance composition, it is not art, but what is on the verge of psychology or psychotherapy.



Posav вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Posav за это полезное сообщение:
Евгений (17.10.2010)