Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 14.10.2010, 09:22 Язык оригинала: Русский       #2
Гуру
 
Аватар для Konstantin
 
Регистрация: 28.03.2008
Сообщений: 9,415
Спасибо: 1,532
Поблагодарили 29,854 раз(а) в 6,714 сообщениях
Записей в дневнике: 10
Репутация: 27272
По умолчанию

Цитата:
About the investment in contemporary art - no art history education is not going to help. On any:
1) 100%risk
2) It is very stretched in time.


Quote:
Цитата:
The British actor Hugh Grant has admitted he was drunk when he bought at auction a portrait of Elizabeth Taylor by Andy Warhol, reports The Daily Mail.

This random purchase made in 2001, greatly enriched the actor: six years later, Grant sold the painting for 13 million pounds to 11 million more than it spent on it. Media wrote that, having bought a Warhol, Grant has proven himself a connoisseur of art, and sell the painting - an expert on trends in the art market
.
Art history education has nothing to do with it.
It is strange that write about it just now on the tape. This "news" has been discussed at a forum in February 2010:
From the topic Simon Faibisovich, the exhibition "Evidence» http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...%82#post884331



Konstantin вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо Konstantin за это полезное сообщение:
Евгений (14.10.2010)