Quote:
Originally Posted by kr555
Is it possible you have another question on statistics ask?
How many in this ranking will be artists from Japan and from China? I have these 2 countries are particularly interested in, and you probably have access to a draft version of the ranking?
In general, an interesting statistic. Total in the world rankings will be 10 thousand artists category 3 or above, of which more than 2 thousands of ex-USSR, which is about 20%. In my opinion, too much, and in fact this is an indication that not all of our local got its 3 categories deserved. Although in terms of patriotic and may be ...
|
It really was a very sensitive issue in all debates - that we have about a fifth of RHR from MHR. Well, the rating that we are not prepared in New York and in Moscow, so that a certain bias towards the native Penates inevitable.
But on the other hand, some countries according to the riches of art history, we can compare with Russia? Four or five, and then different in different epochs. In addition, the USSR was the only "patronage" by the state, and the percentage composition of the artists there had been much higher than the world average.
So all in all, I think. everything is fine. MHR will - yet time to discuss, I hope.
Added after 14 minutes
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Maler
I'm not a fan of the Shilov and know me, many will disagree, but, oddly enough, Shilov and Rabin, in a sense been "on the same side" regarding the previous government ... I mean, Shilov and Glazunov took themes objectionable previous indication of power. Shilov, became the first to write glamorous portraits, all very professional, that is what made him so popular. A Glazunov first took a Christian theme and it brought him popularity ... Both were not "sotsovskimi" topics.
|
"Market" in the Soviet era was not only "sotse. Generally speaking, "social" in its literal sense, after the "severe style" was no longer so dominant, even in the minds of party ideology. So here, again, can only be treated individually.
And think about finding Shilov and Glazunov in category "B" it is unlikely that anyone having an objection. This is a relatively Bragovskogo, Žilina, Zverkova, Grits or Salakhova still be arguing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Maler
You quote "myself", but the common law may look different on the use of someone's name "for personal gain" (as it is formulated, if you sell the results of using these names and not their subject matter no sale). If someone wants to mess (ie suing) ...
You are registered as mass media? But the media only provide information, without count (except, of course, the direct violation of the law).
|
Art. 47 "Law on Mass Media says it is about the judgments and estimates. And no personal gain here, too, no: the rights and duties of media owners (ZAGRAEVSKY in this case) is clearly stated in the same law, and generally operates at the RC-profit organization - PSC.
The same example: here is the newspaper wrote about a noble combiner and gave him evaluate what he zamechatelnyy.Tak that - and this newspaper in court to drag that used the name of the combiner in order to reap the benefits?
I do not worry, if for us at least somewhere you could legally undermine, over the 11 years of ratings and many thousands of disgruntled priori we would be inundated with lawsuits
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Maler
Whom you intend to offer? I do not at Sotheby's there?
|
Look
Added after 21 minutes
Quote:
Originally Posted by artcol
The train came to understand the reasons for my rejection EXP - the whole thing in the title. If it would be called a credit rating "One HR" and "XP ZAGRAEVSKY" - all questions have been shot themselves. And the name of the maker would be perpetuated.
|
This is not only ZAGRAEVSKY rating! Do not forget about the Cantor Meylanda, Martynova, Klimenko, Gilodo, Severyukhina and many others? Yes, and I do not forget, I am also a member of the RC
"Work it, Vanya, was scary was enormous - not up one! (C) Nekrasov
Can certainly be called "Rating behalf ZAGRAEVSKY"
"I think it would be nice