[Ольга Озолина]

Сообщение от fabosch

Written, perhaps, not bad, but really, too general and not on the role of social perception of works of art

Сообщение от K-Maler

I believe that their positions are determined, as well as in the ranking of states on demand market, there remains the question of cost. Otherwise, you should decide you write an article or art history ... Rating what you create?

The question of cost - is extremely delicate, and depends on many factors, one of the main factors is the assessment of art criticism (including in the form of articles). But critics, in turn, are guided by many factors, including the cost.

And develops in parallel with humanity unwieldy system called "Art History", which affect hundreds or thousands of factors.

Including social.

Added after 10 minutes

Сообщение от Inquisitive

Olga Ozolin,
Finally, you started to answer one of my questions - about the methodology to include artists in EXP.
Of course, I am most interested in the issue of inclusion in the EXP of all learners or graduates of institutions of tsarist Russia, the USSR and the Russian Federation. On this occasion, you are silent, as a partisan.
But your gay relationships to turn to Herod Shilkgrubera artist of the twentieth century - Hitler, I can not share. Not for ethical reasons, for some reason.
As soon, EXP, as you say, take into account some undeciphered ethical reasons, then it would be interesting to know the ethical relation to those artists who (except pictures) written denunciations of fellow artists.
Others signed a collective letter in response to the question: "Who are you, Master of Arts?".
Still others create masterpieces that they sang praises another Herod the twentieth century by the name of Dzhugashvili, turning ugly monster into an angel of heaven. In the minds of the masses.
Pictures of all the three categories of artists I actively acquired by museums, for they were held solo and group exhibitions, the press and critics have been positive, and some of these artists were awarded state awards. With the collapse of the Soviet Union demand for their paintings grew.
So from the standpoint of the criteria EXP at all of them in order.
Question: "Are your trade union question on listing and taksirovke for EXP I mentioned three categories of artists in terms of ethics?".
Or in this case, ethics does not make any difference?

1) itself, graduation does not mean that a person became a professional artist. Therefore, education is taken into account in the rating of, but only as one factor.
And in any case, the artist will be added to the EXP just the lists of graduates. We must see the work, but it's either the exhibition or catalogs, or sending of reproductions in the RC.

2) If I remember an anecdote, a cheerful attitude that does not mean . In general, I like any intelligent person will never forget that "genius and evil - two things are incompatible." Believe me, do not forget about this and other members of the RC.
The problem is that there is a secret do not always become apparent. If you have specific names and facts - we are grateful.