Цитата:
Сообщение от fabosch
Can not agree with you. It seems to me many years has been largely will not care who was in hiding and who is in officialdom. remain pure artistic essence. If we want to understand this point, we should ignore the social aspects of ... Of course we are almost impossible to do, so we are so hard ...
After all, it concerns, say the formal and non-conformism and CX 1960-70-ies. It is now important for us - nonconformist or from the Union, because it is part of our lives - we do not slip out of a never
|
I think that pure artistic essence of society is still (unfortunately!) Does not happen. And belyutintsy and buldozerschiki, and beekeepers and Twenty without a specific social context in the majority perceived totally differently. It is clear that such titans as Rabin or Nemukhin could do without bulldozers, but we perceive them as well - not sure. Yes, and future generations - as they do without the historical facts? How, for example, now take Soroka out his tragic fate? And Viktor Popkov - how?
And then, all the artists in this or that era, despite all the declarations, are oriented to each other (even with a minus sign). And you can not, describing the Rabin era, do not remember Nalbandian
"Dialectics, you know
It seems that this dialectic in the EXP is just expressed in A and B. I understand that many of these letters are annoying, but it is the main art criticism score.
Figures - it is known, sales and much more.
But the letter - should be the same once were to stand next to at least several leading art critics and the whole country loudly, in an accessible and applicable to all artists form to declare: Rabin - is Rabin, and Shilov - it Shilov! Berlin - a Berlin, Tsereteli - a Tsereteli!