Цитата:
Сообщение от K-Maler
This is indeed an interesting question. Once upon a time I have led tours. And definitely was as follows: if three times (ie in different groups) have asked the same question, the text should be changed.
Here is something similar: many are unhappy. This may not be accidental. Moscow Union of Artists, not only refused to help, but deployed explained the motivation of failure (it was here somewhere unpublished).
Partly not true that applied a form of art criticism assessment, claiming even to the analysis, then it is clear from the materials themselves and the number of artists that such analysis was not. Many do not even know they were there and what criteria they are in one group or another. Many are incorrect ...
|
I totally agree that in respect of 80-90%(my number is arbitrary, but thinking that it is not far from the truth) unwitting participants in the rating is no real art history analysis could not be, if only by virtue of purely physical causes, it is more precisely on the assessment " without thinking. "
But it seems to me that the main stumbling block for many is unacceptable at the very idea that artists can build a portfolio and rank relative to each other. Everything else, including specific claims on the absurdity of many (in fact it's all subjective oche), in essence, a form of expression of the global dissent.
Yet, I regret that
Olga Ozolin left forum. Forum has lost yet another paint. The more different voices, the better the chance to learn something new, to see the world in all its contradictions, complexity and depth, not as one-dimensional, even if harmonious picture