[Евгений]

Сообщение от Inquisitive

was widely misconception about limitless freedom of the parties regarding the conditions of the concluded contract.
Forced to disappoint - inconsistency of contract law entails the nullity of the transaction. For recognition of the transaction null and void does not require a court order.
The court's decision on the consequences of the invalidity of a void transaction can be taken at the initiative of an interested party or the court itself (st.st.166-168 CC RF).
Conclusion: The terms of the contract must be lawful - comply with the rule of law applicable Russian laws. Denial of legal rights - is negligible.
Therefore, often, any deal with the "free" terms of the contract (in particular, contains a legally incorrect standard contract conditions) is threatened by declaring it null and void, and the consequences of the transaction - null and void.
The term of the right to demand - 3 years.

Сообщение от Inquisitive

Deductions from resales (since the entry of RF Government Resolution in force in its entirety) is a government regulation. Not to protect the rights of creators, and to obtain the state of the holders of the tax on personal income ......
The second question is about bringing the agreements to sell works of art in line with the norms of the Civil Code

Сообщение от Inquisitive; 1318521"

So one of the top priorities (not important - what kind of organization) is the guidance of legal order in sales.

The meaning is here to discuss? There is a theme of "UPRAVIS" there it will be interesting to read ..

Сообщение от Eugene

This arrangement has already been created-for-profit Partnership for the protection and rights management in the arts" UPRAVIS
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...92%D0%98%D0%A1