[dedulya37]

Сообщение от Sergeyitch

But perhaps you have formed such an opinion, because you watch these artists?
And look after Aivazovsky - also something may search.

Sure! I would not say if he did not know.
For Aivazovsky do not want to follow, a good artist, but since he became popular in raspaltsovannyh circles, I felt sorry for Ivan Konstantinovich never know whose eye you'll be happy in the future.

Сообщение от Eugene

should organize all the material on the works Stozharov, exhibition catalogs, archives, monographs and t.d.Zanimatsya this professionally, but not from case to case.

Thanks for the tip, on the basis of the foregoing, I can not draw conclusions about fakes, all this is done and passed many years ago.

Сообщение от LCR

the style she had absolutely nothing to do with the artist, which she attributed. Just from the back side was written the name of the artist (not a signature, namely the name).
The dealer who sold it, brought it to the State Tretyakov Gallery - and received the certificate!

Absolutely agree with you about the attribution of the Tretyakov Gallery.
And exactly the same stories happen to me. They put no signature, and the name, at best, indicate "attributed to".
It comes to the ridiculous, the buyer brings to me the dealer who sold the bogus attribution to the Tretyakov Gallery, I say that work is nothing to do with the author not immeet, in response to the dealer claims that I, too, lying, as he would like more to sell. He is goofy, does not understand that we have different sources of pictures and I have a reliable attribution. By the way, now many experts involved in order to preserve their reputation, have to contact directly.

Сообщение от LCR

In the end it was bought by one collector, "because it was inexpensive," that is thrown to the wind is not very much money, but now does not know what to do with it.

  Unfortunately, I know of several people. Believe me, it was very difficult to tell them the truth, but the principle of "fair play", in my opinion, important.