Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 09.10.2010, 23:29 Язык оригинала: Русский       #167
Гуру
 
Аватар для fabosch
 
Регистрация: 06.04.2010
Адрес: Санкт-Петербург
Сообщений: 1,283
Спасибо: 3,923
Поблагодарили 4,953 раз(а) в 992 сообщениях
Репутация: 9945
По умолчанию

In some of the posts in this thread flashed an interesting idea that edhurey bad that it is a closed structure. A weak, rather than grumble on edhurey make their ratings (for example, the rating of the forum "Artinvestment"). To base the list of artists from this edhureya (this information is not copyrighted) and pogolosovat "whole world". It is clear that there are many technical, and perhaps, not only technical problems. But any technical issue can be resolved - there is a will to solve them, rather than a desire to explain why this can be done. Each participant can put any artist any evaluation (eg based on 20 points, not 14 as in edhuree that is not tied) once a year. It is clear that I could not put points all 40 thousand (or however many there edhuree, I do not remember exactly) artists. And because the register on the forum and everyone can then be obtained and the structure of an open and lively. All ratings for each artist used to derive its arithmetic mean - that's his ranking. It is also clear that for a while most of the artists, especially lesser-known, will be unrated. Well, it does not matter edherey also did not immediately ...
As you are such an idea - my word he coined
By the way, I think the result will generally be close to edhureyu



fabosch вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Этот пользователь сказал Спасибо fabosch за это полезное сообщение:
Pavel (10.10.2010)