Цитата:
Сообщение от Eugene
|
We are talking about are totally different.
Different (sort of) non-profit organizations (foundations) are. As a rule, a sinecure for his - family (relatives) officials. Especially funny when these organizations realize the resolutions of the Government, and even more so - the Russian Federation. As is easy to install on the text of RF Government, there is no indication of an authorized government body control (service), which would be responsible for monitoring. In such cases, the control rests with the Russian government itself. And then there is someone (like a non-profit organization, not to disclose their documents of title) and on an unknown basis of (the law) begins to contract.
This is a trick for avoiding taxation has long been known and used for money laundering in virtually all okolochinovnichih structures.
In short, any business has the right (scoring in the Charter of the required service) is entitled to engage in such activities.
However.
There will be something that can happen with any organization, lost in dreams to create your own EXP under another name (for example, an objective summary rating - SRF).
Just trample.
All inspection and supervisory authority.
Now the essence of your question.
Deductions from resales (since the entry of RF Government Resolution in force
full) is a government regulation. Not to protect the rights of creators, and to obtain the state of the holders of tax on income of individuals.
It has no relation to the activities of trade union organization and does not absolve its responsibility for protecting the legitimate rights and interests of artists.
You have touched on only one set me questions.
The second question is about bringing the agreements to sell works of art in line with the norms of the Civil Code
It is no secret that the sale is "in black" - is illegal. And where there is lawlessness begins, it is meaningless to talk about protecting the rights and legitimate interests.
First of all, the fact that sales (and then reselling) hiding. From this it follows that the decision of the Russian government in such cases becomes invalid. Thus, it remains wishful thinking and nothing more (not applicable regulatory legal act subject to the unconditional execution). I'm not saying (yet) about other aspects of the existing order sales (resales). Must create and modify the terms of these sales are included in the ticket sellers, who essentially do not correspond to the current legislation of the Russian Federation.
The right to establish this (special order sales of original works), only the Russian government (by law).
The question before Pavitelstvom CAN SUPPLY unions. Come out openly against the tyranny of sellers for any artist is a recipe for his many problems. This is the essence of the existing fartsovogo art business. The complete lack of rights the artist (the creator). Regardless of whether it is for his income from the sale of the result of his work only or no (Thanks to
kazerov for the remark).
Of course, I raised the questions presented fairly dry, and often sketchy. Would otherwise have to write "War and Peace" in four volumes.
But I hope to fill the issues in the case of further discussions.