[Pavel]

Сообщение от Olga Ozolina

Why the West is no such "ratings"? Interesting question, and a lot of opinions expressed. Personally, I think they simply do not need expert ratings, they have the exact ratings (sales, it was mostly recorded). And another reason may be that home: they do not have such a sharp polarization of the art market and public taste, as we have.

Tell the history of Pro Rating artists (at least today) thought everything, and even much earlier than a union of artists. But everything depended on that: how to combine in a single rating, for example, Kabakov and Shilov, or Rabin and Glazunov? The polarization of this in the late 90s was perhaps even more than now. And the sick - that's for sure. Now seems to be used anymore, but then still lived illusion

Читать дальше... 

As a result, there have been attempts compilation "corporate" ratings (Gelman Gallery, "C-Art," still a lot of people), but the overall rating does not threaten anybody.

Yes, and it was hard to wipe - everyone understood that you have to consider the tens of thousands of artists. With all its consequences in the form of thousands of disgruntled "So here was initially need some kind of effective system that works great and then not been in vain.

Then ZAGRAEVSKY came up (he said he dreamed at night ), the main idea EXP - Categories A and B. And once all the polarization has its place. Of course, there were many "intermediate" artists, even the proposed category of "AB", but then gradually everything will somehow was settled. Over the years, some trends are identified.

This is all just Russian specificity, in the West such complexity to anything. Right now we have done MHR.
http://rating.artunion.ru/international.htm
Let's see, what will the reaction of the West. East, as you know, a delicate matter, and the West - not less

Added after 9 minutes


About the West, I just did not have time to answer you, see my post above.

The rest. Did someone hurt the honor and dignity of the name of the rating categories? "The prevailing professional artist, with creativity," etc.? And what else can touch here? That Repin in the 1st category, you are in 4th or 5th? Well, you become as famous, and you will be in the 1st

Here ssylochku read there here on what words pay attention to:
http://rating.artunion.ru/normativ1.htm



And recall that exp - a registered media, with all its consequences in the form of free speech.

R.S. Also draws your attention that the culprit anyone can be called only after the entry into force of the criminal court. So it's not whether you are an artist, we might have to file for your claim for defamation.

You are terribly frightened me. "I told you explained the reason the West is not such ratings. There rankings are not necessary as we do. Enough price. there Akun. You instead to arrange the sale artists arrange the sale of your books which by the way base their choice and the impact they have on sale, but are often mislead buyers. I've seen your writing in Gelos and there to nimu taken seriously, but it is fraught with fraud, because your rating is from the lantern. I did not ask for example, and I'm not your member, and generally you take the money else included in the rating, it means the money can give any rating.
By the way a professional artist is an artist who earns painting and the quality is not withdrawn. More than in France, it is equivalent to the highest category of painters.
 Attitude to Repin differently, many believe his academic painter not very well received new developments and so it is quite routine and literary. Therefore it is necessary and correct to proceed from the actual price and not on your personal opinion.