Risk of being broken by all parties concerned, I would like, however, radically protect Vladimir foliage.
And so the question: why do good things with respect to the artist to publish this article, which cause damage to his reputation?
Take the recent publication of it (the author - Todd Prince) --
Цитата:
Сообщение от Eugene
|
That's interesting artist tells how he consistently outlive those features of his work, which prevented the success of the buyers.
Apparently, in the U.S. this insistence on the way to the bucks should call a special respect.
Let's listen to the opinion Brenity Mirisoly, the American patron of the artist:
«In order to display the work we are now a creative artist, they must be really something very unique - says Mirisola. - Paintings Kush drop visitors call on them should reflect a little. For example, Chagall - in front of you a bouquet of flowers and dancers, and nothing more ».
Читать дальше...
M-da ... Poor, unpretentious Chagall, well, where it unique to the maestro ...
Pictures make "some speculate" - a challenge to the American public!
Thanks to the artist that he did not consider themselves surrealist, though not strongly object when others do it. And how to object if the same Mirosola authoritatively states: «Kush can call himself anything you like, but 99 out of 100 visitors to the gallery will assign him to the surrealist genre.
Correct! It is high time all the artistic problems to solve public vote. Once people are saying Sur - means sur.
... etc.
This article would have looked great in a popular magazine, addressed to the public, not held thin. campaign against illiteracy.
But what should cause similar texts in the community which seeks to be guided by professional standards in art?
In the context of a serious forum - it is negative publicity for the artist.
Talents differ. And so in his own talented artist and good guy Kusch did not come under fire, do not put it in context is not commensurate with his talent of art. Not the same Tretyakov Gallery holds exhibitions teddy bears in the hall Vrubel.
And in general, fuss broke out because of unclear policies of Ms. Krasnyanskaya, which discusses the need for good education of taste and style (see the beginning of the topic), but not always confirm words with actions.
If the gallery wants to position itself as an elite, it imposes a rigid framework in the selection and submission artists.
Over Bazaar to be answered.