Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 25.09.2010, 12:09 Язык оригинала: Русский       #15
Гуру
 
Аватар для artcol
 
Регистрация: 13.09.2008
Сообщений: 12,070
Спасибо: 6,204
Поблагодарили 6,550 раз(а) в 3,042 сообщениях
Репутация: 12902
Отправить сообщение для artcol с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от artist Посмотреть сообщение
I was a little long.
Will question the main thing: expert advice, finally began to understand musjrnoy heap, called his principles. And just a little promise. Ooooooochen little)))
Explain.
In general, no wonder why. "Iron Horse", once again takes the place of Dadaist horse)))
The fact that in many terminalogiii, and a forum - not the exception, is the proud name of contemporary art, as a rule, free from plastic shaped thinking on the traditions of painting, sculpture and graphics, but a different kind of action, having no practical or aesthetic purposes . In keeping with this trend (by the way, has long been outdated, dating back to the works of "beloved" by me Roger Fry .. Herbert Read, Clive Bell and other boys from the British Bloomsbury Group)
So what does all this for a long time - the dust ... The top of this trend (of dust), its total vector - actionism conceptualism and 50's, 70's). With this we are living, considering themselves fashionable and smart.
I certainly have an opinion on these "topical" areas, but in this case. It does not matter. It is important that conceptualism, which many people love so much and do not give offense to, in essence, can not be judged as art. The only thing that connects the conceptualist shares with the arts - what people are doing this activity, in habit, called artists. These men (there's nothing personal) has long passed unnoticed by them hell, limiting what can be called art.
Actually, "Art-Moscow" hopelessly retarded. Back in the late twentieth century (years already twenty) liberation of art from aesthetics and semantics has ceased to produce this intellectuals impression.
Yes, thirty years ago, visual evoked ridicule and criticism in the West, and our lumpen-art-extremists.
But after thirty years.
Descriptiveness is celebrating its return. Best and, really, actual work today, something portrayed.
This is another round of fine art, but "a return to the track" ...
Do not worry about yesterday, the more so that today (for example, "ArtMoskva"), as used to say, at the time, Leonid Brezhnev: "reveals the large reserves." In Russian, this means: we'll have again a lot of work, hours Toba get the result, because the current, no matter what will not do, that there did not buy the lumpen buyer ...
I agree with throwing and add the following:
1) any work of traditional art narratively (of this thesis, we can deduce many consequences of different order) - so historically
2) rejection of the narrative - it desubektivizatsiya subject, its shizofrenizatsiya, and in this context - with a minus sign, "" negative "(for the lumpen, and obviously it is the most myakotka), this can be played (such as a razor), but result will remain disabled
3) each chooses his own art - and indignant about this makes no sense "The most important thing - to understand

IN DUST WE TRUST ...




Последний раз редактировалось artcol; 25.09.2010 в 12:16.
artcol вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 3 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо artcol за это полезное сообщение:
K-Maler (30.09.2010), L-ana64110 (25.09.2010), Yurko (25.09.2010)