In blogs wave of indignation because of construction work on Borovitskaya area directly between the home Pashkov and the Kremlin. According to bloggers and media on this site to build a new building for the Moscow Kremlin Museums - depository area of 23 thousand square meters. Building project developed by the architect Vladimir Kolosnitsyn, who previously worked on new buildings Voyentorg and the Arena. All the houses on the site of the present buildings were demolished in 1972, the Soviet visit by U.S. President Richard Nixon. Opponents of development argue that the project, which is implemented now, not been agreed with UNESCO - the organization is considering a zone of the Kremlin as a World Heritage Site. In addition, according to advocates Borovitskaya area, the developer neglects binding archaeological work, highlighting the archaeologists are only three small areas.
September 20 members of the public for some time managed to stop the maintenance work.
http://www.lenta.ru/news/2010/09/21/pashkov/
Добавлено через 3 минуты
WARNING, MOSCOW!
Rustam Rahmatullin
At Borovitskaya area is growing construction fence. In the quarter between moss and Manezhnaya streets begins construction depository of Moscow Kremlin Museums. Design on this site has a long history, but the beginning of the work was a complete surprise to the Muscovites.
Green waste ground on Borovitskaya formed after the demolition in 1972. That's when the house first before Pashkov formed so familiar to us esplanade bounded by ragged edges of the surviving homes. With this flaw, of course, had something to do. But what?
July 3, 2006) [/URL]. It was a question of choosing between the three classic and three modernist variants. Classic options, according to the author assumed that if a dialogue, whether the dispute with the House Pashkova in his language: all three were centric, and certificates of a three-part, two of the three - dome. Oppressive feeling of creative destruction was visited by members of Gradsoveta at first glance at the boards, let alone the thought that one of these options could be implemented, it became sickening.
Not by accident the defenders stood on the Heritage Council for the modernist variants, that is, above all for expressing a different artistic language. It is important that the modernist is a curve of the plane, and hence, the architecture can become a hill, not a house on the hill. This idea belongs to the architect Alexander Asadov (among other things, mosproektovtsu), who in 1990 advised to turn the lawn on the hillside in the glass, removing the rest under the ground. I do not know how to react to Muscovites to this approach, but the modernist versions Kolosnitsyna not have to do with him: the building depositary swelled, turning into a hill on the hill. Mayor inevitably chose classical.
On Monday, the defenders of old Moscow, cemented by the victory in Kadashi, lesions in the Estate Alexeyev and another victory in the Estate Volkonskiis, gathered at the gate construction. Behind the gates of a bulldozer without the participation of archaeologists cut the slope of the hill. Information sheet no. Directorate of Museums of the Kremlin in the face of Yuri Sergeyev, deputy construction without waiting for the excesses, invited all to the office.
At first glance approvals included. There is even a harmonization of the National Committee of UNESCO (Borovitskaya area covered by protected zone of the Kremlin). However, the committee agreed on a version without the dome, and the projects to be implemented, the dome - or, rather, gazebo - there. This leads to a simple explanation: the visa of the National Committee dated May 2008, and in July the project again held Gradsovet.
Such a material difference must be metric expression. Indeed, a year ago, supervisory audits allow the height of 22.4 meters and height of the implemented option - 23,8. Which option agreed Rosokhrankultura, Moskomnaslediye and other worthy organizations in 2008 and 2009, remains anyone's guess.
Thus, the agreement obsolete, in other words - the project is not agreed. Demanded once outdoor congregation to find a simple fact.
However, the protest at the Borovitskaya area is not so much legal as architectural and critical nature. Documents are correct, but you can not tweak the selected architectural solution. We say: the basis of the project - the result of the competition in 1997, and this will be true. But this is frankly a weak result. We are, as usual, will say: where were you when the decision was taken. The opposition members and experts Gradsoveta - a protocol. But the majority of Muscovites do not realize that you can penetrate Gradsovet. Order OATI the Works expires October 1. This does not warrant the construction of this order to the preparatory work: the fence, cabins, temporary communications, cutting the lawn. The Moscow Kremlin - too venerable organization to assume the costs of architectural mediocrity and bosses tastelessness.
http://www.izvestia.ru/moscow/article3146385/