Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 19.09.2010, 11:50 Язык оригинала: Русский       #9
Гуру
 
Аватар для artcol
 
Регистрация: 13.09.2008
Сообщений: 12,069
Спасибо: 6,204
Поблагодарили 6,549 раз(а) в 3,041 сообщениях
Репутация: 12901
Отправить сообщение для artcol с помощью Skype™
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от sergejnowo Посмотреть сообщение
he is such an abstraction does not understand and do not accept, hence the easy sarcasm.
Written as a question, I would like to hear opinions ...
Pigments, primers, and canvas in a magnifying glass looking, smarter than this did not become a <!--~ ~ ->
I think - this is sketchy things. Frankly, I do not know my work by this artist, and therefore also difficult to say which tasks are an artist in this sketch. In my opinion - more historical than artistic artifact. But mb mistaken?

Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzranskiy Посмотреть сообщение
a magnifying glass look is good. And took pictures?
The fact is that we must have quality pictures of Polyakova (and not only). Sufficient quality (approximately 10 MB) to give the enlarged fragments of paintings to illustrate their words.
Kirill, and where you can read more about Polyakov? In nete not found.
And found ... look ...




Последний раз редактировалось artcol; 19.09.2010 в 11:59. Причина: Добавлено сообщение
artcol вне форума   Ответить с цитированием