Right, of course ... Still, let's agree: everyone who participated in the discussion of works Golovin - judges. No, rather than judges and juries). In the end, Mr. Golovin, issued its own creativity to the discussion forum. So he was interested in the opinion of all who are watching and writing. Apparently, he expects, and certain verdict. And what could be a verdict on this case? Only this: The Art of whether what Mr. Golovin does or blundering. Bring the same sentence is not our problem Although, in the case of the artists last vedikt worse pyubogo sentence. and nothing for him it will not. However, to make the most equitable verdict is absolutely necessary to move to the consideration of such evidence as the preference of Mr. Golovin in the world of painting of the twentieth HH1vv. However, it would be nice to find out what he disliked in her. I think everybody is clear that the great majority for Mr. Golovin names are concentrated in Х1Х and earlier centuries. But what he likes in the twentieth century and ХХ1. For most of us, I suppose, a mystery. We, I think, we do not think the art world in its entirety without these two outstanding centuries (at least I). So, Mr. Golovin, I beg you! Hopefully I will support them.
|