Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 10.09.2010, 21:09 Язык оригинала: Русский       #1
Пользователь
 
Регистрация: 02.08.2010
Адрес: САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГ
Сообщений: 46
Спасибо: 70
Поблагодарили 155 раз(а) в 38 сообщениях
Репутация: 310
По умолчанию

Igor Guriev,
Lingering pathos?
I do not even understand what a beast this ... pathos ... yes still lingering ...

Cyril Syzranskiy,
if briefly about the camera:
is a separate issue, in the 19th century. artists used photos.
Authors such as Alma-Tadema, Semiradsky, Vereshchagin, Shishkin, etc.
and many other artists.
The tag line is that few have a magic wand, we must also
The camera is a tool for artists who need to be able to use.
If you do not know, then he immediately subjects the artist to his will, and author
Lots of examples of paintings is, where an amateur artist with a camera=a monkey with a grenade.

I-V,
From these two pictures I personally choose not possible.
One outspoken commercial conjuncture, in my opinion, written by
moreover, not very professional. Sintementalnost girls with
Kotik on the verge of idiocy. Painting specially made for the template
perception of the average citizen.
Another picture is quite leaves, me personally, indifferent.
performance ... nothing makes my eyes stop.
Beauty is not in any of them. I repeat, for me personally.
Abstain from choice, because choice equivalent to the question executioner:
You are to drive needles under his nails, iron or titanium?



Алексей Головин вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Эти 7 пользователя(ей) сказали Спасибо Алексей Головин за это полезное сообщение:
Allena (16.09.2010), I-V (10.09.2010), Yurko (10.09.2010), Артём (10.09.2010), Евгений (11.09.2010), Пелагея Ларина (28.04.2011), Тютчев (11.09.2010)