Lady Tar generally suffers radicalism and total rejection of dissent.
I really have fun reading her answers to questions readers lenta.ru.
"Galleries - a private business selling art, that art is not always good."
"It's not being so, what is the actual art, but there are parallel to some traditional. The traditional left in the past, those who today they are engaged, are engaged in a kind of fishing. There is still Palekh boxes and Khokhloma - so that's "contemporary traditional art" as you put it in the same status. "I will now know how to call you names familiar traditional artists, and gay-oriented art will praise.
The above was the answer to the question: 'Why do you think galleries, which open on the money borrowed from other fields of business, and owned by wives or girlfriends bankers almost all engaged in "contemporary art"? "
"Generally speaking, modern art, as well as basic science,
" - a complex area that requires education, and I would not advise him to judge those who, even with the Russian language there are certain problems. " About the fundamental science laughed. Consumers sovr.iskusstva probably only theoretical physicists, but they sell it for some reason the wife bankers. We must defer to the gallery space nat-mats.
"Regarding the last question: yes, the work of Piero Manzoni, Artist's shit" is stored in an art museum and, therefore, is an art. "Artist's shit" is a work of art, not the artist's shit, because it invested considerable intellectual force of the author and the hundreds of art historians and philosophers who have written about this and write. "Hud.muzee stored in another bucket of cleaners, and they invested a lot of intellectual work to create. Hordes of engineers, founders, punchers took part in their creation. Unlike them, I can not envy the "hundreds of art" looking in the ....
In connection with Manzoni, an excellent answer she gave on the criteria for extraordinary potential sovr.isk.: "The criteria are: the credibility of the shape and depth of content that should offend and touch intellectually or emotionally."
"The product is good, if it worries and concerns (and not lull the beauty and harmony)" - after reading this, immediately came up with a copy of Contemporary Art,
Paint a frenzied rat white and put in a low-Glass Aquarium. Called "Snow Queen".
But critics napridumayut that this protest against the "snow" of glass balls and a middle class ordinary people who have "problems with the Russian language" (E. Tar), as if language affects perception of art, rather than paid tryndezh about him.
At the beginning of talks about "dozens of sites" only in St. Petersburg, where you can learn sovr.iskusstvom, and in 3 paragraphs: "contemporary Russian art now occupies in the world's a tiny place, which is associated with an almost complete absence of institutions that would help the artist, encourage creativity and brings it to the viewer. Artists fight alone. "Amazing consistency.
"There is no God. That is all I would say in answer to that question. "
"Vasnetsov and Aivazovsky painted very badly, I say to you as a professional art historian and expert on the art of 19 century."
If all this radicalism to feeding, as the curator sovr.isk .- okay, but if it is - casual manner of communication and this way of thinking, you can not even imagine how people deal with it.